Iqbal v. Asharaf K.K.
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petitioner claiming ownership of a pathway filed a review seeking to curb a previous order allowing an underground water pipeline. The court held that civil title disputes were not for this court to adjudicate but noted the pipeline should not create absolute rights.
What did the court decide?
Review petition disposed without necessity; rights under the pipeline order are not absolute.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2014/20TH ASHADHA, 1936
RP.No. 487 of 2014
-----------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 14781/2014 DATED 18-06-2014)
REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD PARTY :
IQBAL, S/O. ABDU,AGED 52 YEARS, PUDUKKAD HOUSE, VENNALA P.O., ARAKKAKADAVU, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN
SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SMT.D.S.THUSHARA
SRI.H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA)
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT :
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a review petition challenging a judgment allowing a water pipeline on a pathway filed by a third party claiming ownership needs to be allowed.
Whether the right to use a pathway for an underground water pipeline involves civil titles that should be adjudicated by the Civil Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Iqbal, S/o. Abdu
- respondent
Asharaf K.K.
- respondent
Kerala Water Authority
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court