Sivaraj v. Unnikrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a regular first appeal settled through mediation. The court agreed to the memorandum of agreement produced by the mediator and refunded the court fee paid by the appellant.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed off as settled; terms of agreement form part of judgment; court fee refunded to appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014/16TH ASWINA, 1936 RFA.No. 361 of 2008 ( ) ------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 431/2006 of PRL.SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA DATED 30-11-2007
APPELLANT/ DEFENDANT:
SIVARAJ. AGED 50, S/O.POTTEPURATHU CHATHUNNY, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, KOORKANCHERY DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 40, S/O.NAMBIYATHU KRISHNANKUTTY, CHENGALOOR VILLAGE, SNEHAPURAM DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KURIACHAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sivaraj
- respondent
Unnikrishnan
Coram
T.R. Ramachandran Nair
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court