Leelamma v. Mary
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the Munsiff Court in Muvattupuzha to determine the issue regarding suit valuation within one month due to unreasonable adjournments in the pending suit.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the learned Munsiff to consider issue No. 1 regarding suit valuation by 12.2.2014.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014/17TH POUSHA, 1935
OP(C).No. 51 of 2014 (O)
I.A.No.2661/2013 IN O.S.No.488/2011 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA
PETITIONER(S)/PLAINTIFF :-
LEELAMMA AGED 60 YEARS W/O.JOSEPH, EDAVAKKANDATHIL HOUSE, KOLANI KARA THODUPUZHA VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY POWER HOLDER MANJU, AGED 38 YEARS W/O.SEBASTIAN
BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR
SRI.M.S.DILEEP
RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANT :-
1. MARY, W/O. CHACKO,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the learned Munsiff to determine the suit valuation issue promptly.
Whether a stay on proceedings in the Munsiff Court is warranted due to excessive adjournments.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Leelamma Aged 60 Years W/O. Joseph
- respondent
Mary
- respondent
Anil
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court