Radha v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/11TH BHADRA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 763 of 2014 (S)
W.P.(C).NO. 17291/2013 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT, DATED 25-10-2013
PETITIONER / PETITIONER :
RADHA, AGED 46 YEARS
W/O.MADHU, NIKATHITHARA HOUSE, (PURATHIYATTU PARAMBU), VADUTHALA P.O, KORUNGOTTA DESOM, CHERANALLOOR VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.P.B.PRADEEP
RESPONDENT / ADDITIONAL 3RD RESPONDENT :
MR. RAJAMANIKYAM,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM - 682 021.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.A.FAYAZ
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-09-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
Con.Case(C).No. 763 of 2014 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE 1 : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17291/2013 DATED 25.10.2013.
ANNEXURE 2 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.11.2013, WITHOUT EXHIBITS.
ANNEXURE 3 : TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT BEARING NO.L10-77069/13 ISSUE TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DATED 25.11.2013.
ANNEXURE 4 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 01.01.2014 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER INTIMATING THE DATE FOR HEARING .
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
Msd.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
================================
Con. Case (C). No. 763 of 2014
================================= Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2014
JUDGMENT
The learned Government Pleader submits that the direction issued by this Court as per Annexure I Judgment has already been complied with. The version is not sought to be rebutted by the petitioner.
The said submission is recorded. No further steps are necessary. The Contempt Case is closed accordingly.
sd/-
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE
das
// True copy //
PA to Judge
Radha
Mr. Rajamanikyam
P.R. Ramachandra Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court