The High Court of Kerala disposed of an anticipatory bail application filed by two accused persons in a case involving alleged property dispute, obscene words, and outrage of modesty. The court dismissed the prayer, noting facts of mischief and threat.
The application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/22ND JYAISHTA, 1936
BAIL APPL..NO. 4213 OF 2014 (B)
------------------------------------------[CRIME NO. 276/2014 OF MELATTUR POLICE STATION , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT]
APPLICANTS/ACCUSED:
1. ABOOBACKER.C., AGED 55 YEARS,
2. ABDUL RAFEEQ C., AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.ABOOBACKER, CHALIL HOUSE, PATHIRIKODE P.O,
BY ADVS.SRI.P.VENUGOPAL, SMT. T.J.MARIA GORETTI.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM [REPRESENTING S.I. OF POLICE, MELATTUR POLICE STATION - CRIME NO.276/2014].
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-06-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Prv.
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
B.A. No. 4213 of 2014
Dated this the 12th day of June, 2014
ORDER
Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Petitioners are accused in Crime No.276/2014 of Melattur
Police Station which has been registered for the offences under Sections 294 (b), 354, 427, 447 and 506 (ii) read with Section 34 I.P.C.
B.A. No. 4213 /2014
2
These facts do not justify granting the prayer of the petitioners.
In the result, this application is dismissed.
SD/-
JV
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE
//true copy//
P.A. TO JUDE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to accused charged with offences arising from a property dispute involving alleged outrage of modesty and destruction of property.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
ABOBACKER.C.
ABDUL RAFEEQ C.
STATE OF KERALA
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
