The learned counsel on both sides submitted that the jurisdiction to decide the issues involved in this writ petition lies with the Central Administrative Tribunal. In the said circumstances, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal in accordance with law. It is to be noted that a Division Bench of this Court in a common judgment dated 2.9.2013 in W.A.No.433 of 2013 and connected matters, taking note of the fact that the question of jurisdiction was taken up for the first time before this Court, while permitting the appellants therein to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, ordered that the respondents shall not raise the question of limitation before the Central Administrative Tribunal. Since the same issues are involved in the captioned writ petition in light of the judgment in W.A.No.433 of 2013 and connected matters this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. In view of the judgment in the aforesaid writ appeals it is further ordered that the respondents shall not take up the
