Dismissed
Aminakutty Umma v. Ottapalam Municipality and 2 Others
Kerala HCWP(C)/4286/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petitioner did not appear; writ petition dismissed for default.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2013/12TH CHAITHRA 1935
WP(C).No. 4286 of 2011 (I)
PETITIONER:
AMINAKUTTY UMMA, 65 YEARS, W/O.YOOSUFF, MOOCHIKKAL HOUSE, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, OTTAPALAM.
BY ADVS.SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI, SRI.R.SREEHARI.
RESPONDENTS:
1. OTTAPALAM MUNICIPALITY, OTTAPALAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-679 101.
2. BUILDING INSPECTOR,
3. M.SHOUKKATHALY, MANJALANGADAN HOUSE, CHERPLASSERY, OTTAPALAM TALUK-679 503.
R1 & R2 BY SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADV. SRI.A.S.SAJUSH PAUL.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-04-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Prv.
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
W.P.(C).4286/2011
Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2013
JUDGMENT
When the case was called, none appeared for the petitioner
and the petitioner is also absent.
Writ petition is therefore, dismissed for default.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
mrcs
/true copy/
sd/- P.A. To Judge
AMINAKUTTY UMMA
OTTAPALAM MUNICIPALITY
BUILDING INSPECTOR
M.SHOUKKATHALY
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court