due to the bank has been fixed. Aggrieved by Ext.P1, the petitioner had challenged the same in R.P.137 of 2010 before the 3rd respondent, Co-operative Tribunal. On 14.12.2008, the same was dismissed for default for the reason that when the matter was taken up, neither the petitioner nor his counsel were present. A restoration application filed by the petitioner was also dismissed on 24.10.2009 for default. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a Review Petition. The said Review Petition has been dismissed as per Ext.P2. It is thereafter that E.P.No.208 of 2011 has been filed by the bank. An order under Order 21 Rule 58 has also been sought by the bank. The amount demanded from the petitioner is Rs.4,82,594/-. All the above proceedings having reached culmination and finality, the present attempt of the petitioner is to have a re-computation and re-fixation of the amount at the hands of the Joint Registrar. The competent authority under the Act having computed and fixed the amount due from the petitioner, the Joint Registrar has no authority to enter into yet another enquiry as to the quantum of the amount that is due from the petitioner. For the above reasons, I do not find any grounds to accept the contentions of the petitioner. The petitioner can put forward any objection that he may have, in the
