Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Jayakumar Vs State of Kerala — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2013)

Home
Kerala HC
2013
Jayakumar Vs State of KeralaJayakumar v. State of Kerala

Dismissed

Jayakumar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC18 Nov 2013WP(C)/2273/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners filed a writ petition. The court held that the matter had become infructuous and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/27TH KARTHIKA, 1935

WP(C).No. 2273 of 2009 (U)

PETITIONERS:

1. JAYAKUMAR .B, AGED 36 YEARS,

S/O.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,

VADAKKEDATHU PUTHEN VEEDU,

AIRAPURAM P.O, AIRAPURAM VILLAGE, KUNNTHUNADU TALUK,

PIN-683 541, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. AJI K.K. AGED 30 YARS, S/O.C.K.KUTTAPPAN, KUMBALATHU HOUSE, VALAYANCHIRAGARA P.O., AIRAPURAM,

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
JAYAKUMAR .B
petitioner
AJI K.K.
respondent
STATE OF KERALA
respondent
KERALA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
respondent
RUBBER PARK INIDA (P) LTD.
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 18 Nov 2013 · November
Registered: 20 Jan 2009
Case no.: WP(C)/2273/2009

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from P.r.ramachandra Menon

Chandy Joseph Vs the Chief Conservator of Forests
15 Nov 2013
K.v.Kurien Vs the Tahsildar
15 Nov 2013
C.K.Rajan Vs State of Kerala
15 Nov 2013
Dhanya Mithran Vs Dr.K.Elangovan
18 Nov 2013

Cite this judgement

Jayakumar v. State of Kerala, WP(C)/2273/2009 (KL), decided on 18 November 2013.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

Parties & counsel

Outcome

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter had become infructuous. No substantive legal issue was adjudicated beyond this procedural outcome.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

PIN-683 556, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.FAZIL.

RESPONDENTS:

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENTSECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. KERALA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (KINFRA), TC.NO.31/2312, KINFRA HOUSE, SASTHAMANGALAM P.O, PIN-695 010, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. RUBBER PARK INIDA (P) LTD.,2A, KAUTILEEYAM, RUBBER PARK, VALAYANCHIRAGARA P.O, AIRAPURAM, PIN-683 556, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

4. MAZHUVANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, AIRAPURAM P.O, PIN-683 541, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REGIONAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY CHIEFENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER.

Prv.

W.P.(C).NO.2273/2009-U:

6. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THEDISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, GENERAL HOSPITAL COMPOUND, ERNAKULAM.

7. M/S.HANKOOK LATEX (P) LTD.,PLOT NO.29, RUBBER PARK, VALAYANCHIRAGARA P.O., AIRAPURAM, PIN-6835 56, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

R1 & R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, R2 BY SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI, SENIOR ADVOCATE, SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR,

SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR,

SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI,

SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS,

SRI.ANIL D. NAIR, R3 BY ADV. SRI.SAJI VARGHESE, R4 BY ADVS. SRI.SHAIJAN C.GEORGE,

SRI.JOHN VIPIN, R5 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS,S.C, R7 BY ADVS. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH,

SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU,

SRI.JAGAN GEORGE,

SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD,

SRI.P.G.PRAMOD,

SRI.K.M.SREEKANTH.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-11-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Prv.

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

W.P.(c) No.2273 OF 2009

Dated this the 18^th day of November, 2013

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter

has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE

sv.

MAZHUVANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH

Coram

AI extract

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

CNR

KLHC010438592009

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

P.r.ramachandra Menon

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

M.I.Sunny Vs the District Collector

18 Nov 2013

A.Ramadas Vs the Village Officer

18 Nov 2013