R.Rachael Gnanadeepam v. P.Souri Muthu
Case brief
What is this about?
This order addresses the validity of service of legal notices via newspaper publication. The High Court observed that publication in the Kozhikode edition alone was insufficient for a petitioner residing in Trivandrum, noting the need for the Trivandrum edition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/16TH MAGHA 1934
WP(C).No. 19368 of 2005 (E)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP.62/2002 of FAMILY COURT,KOZHIKODE.
PETITIONER(S):
R.RACHAEL GNANADEEPAM, 116 MANAVA NAGAR, TC 36/352, PETTAH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL
RESPONDENT(S):
1. P.SOURI MUTHU, S/O.PETER
- C/O.SRI.P.S.SUBBRAYYAN, MATHALAGULAM STREET
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether service of notice by way of publication in the Kozhikode edition of Mathrubhumi is sufficient when the petitioner resides in Trivandrum.
Whether the petitioner can be deemed served after one notice was refused by a servant upon her absence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. RACHAEL GNANADEEPAM
- respondent
P. SOURI MUTHU
- respondent
UTHAMI
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (HRD), AIR INIDA, MUMBAI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court