Gulf countries. Be as it may, the fact remain, the property in question was first mortgaged to the respondent Bank and later, it was mortgaged to Punjab National Bank. The second mortgage is discharged and the first mortgage in favour of the respondent Bank still continues. Now, SARFAESI proceedings are initiated for recovery of loans. According to the appellant the other three properties are more valuable than the property purchased by her. Therefore, the respondent bank should proceed against the other properties. So far as her claim and the fraud played on her by the 3rd respondent, it is between the appellant and the 3rd respondent and the respondent bank has nothing to do with the said fraud played by the 3rd respondent. So far as the liability of the 3rd respondent Bank, they being the secured creditor so far as this property is concerned, they are justified in seeking the recovery of loan amount under the SARFAESI proceedings, which apparently is at the stage of taking possession of the property with the aid of Chief Judicial Magistrate. If other three properties are more valuable than the present property, it is always open to the appellant to see that the purchasers are found by her who can participate in the auction if any and she can save her property. If her property alone or along with other properties are brought for sale, her recourse is only against the 3rd respondent herein not only for recovery of money but
