High Court of Kerala rejected a matrimonial appeal where the appellant could not trace the respondent's address. Counsel submitted non-locating was sufficient; no further order delivered.
Appeal rejected; no further relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
&
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/23RD MAGHA 1934
Mat.Appeal.No. 598 of 2010 ( )
-----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.01.2010 IN OP NO.631/2007 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KANNUR
APPELLANT(S)RESPONDENT:
SUSHEELA, D/O.LATE KORAN, RESIDING AT 'SHIVAPRASAD' AT KHADI, KAIBATTAL MANGALORE-2.
BY ADVS.SMT.PRABHA R.MENON SRI.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
P.PREMACHANDRAN,S/O.GOVINDAN, RESIDING AT PUTHENKANDY HOUSE, NEERVELI PO VIA NIRMALAGIRI, KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR-670643
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BKA
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
&
P. D. RAJAN, JJ.
Mat. Appeal No. 598 of 2010
Dated this the 12th day of February, 2013
J U D G M E N T
Pius C. Kuriakose, J.
Smt.Prabha R. Menon, the learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the appellant has not been able to get the correct address of the respondent so far. We notice the order dated 20.12.2012. That order has
worked out by itself. The appeal stands rejected.
Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE.
Sd/- P. D. RAJAN, JUDGE.
bka/-
//True copy//
PA to Judge
SUSHEELA, D/O.LATE KORAN
P.PREMACHANDRAN, S/O.GOVINDAN
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
P.D.RAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
