Court dismissed the matrimonial appeal without examining the merits of the grounds raised as it was posted for disposal along with other pending items.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE &
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/17TH MAGHA 1934
Mat.Appeal.No. 496 of 2007 ( )
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP.954/1998 of FAMILY COURT,TRIVANDRUM DATED 30-04-2007
APPELLANT/COUNTER PETITIONER:
HARIHARAN NAIR.R., S/O.RAGHAVAN NAIR PARAMBUKONATHU THARIYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, NOTTAMOODU NARUVAMOODU P.O., PALLICHAL VILLAGE NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.
BY ADV. SMT.A.SALINI LAL
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS:
1. SMT.SOBHANAKUMARI, AGED.35 YEARS, D/O.SYMALA AMMA, MELEPULIYARATHALA VEEDU, NOTTAMOODU NARUVAMOODU P.O., PALLICHAL VILLAGE NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.
2. VINEETHA, AGED.15 YEARS,
R,R1,2 BY ADV. SRI.V.J.JAYAKUMAR ABRAHAM R,R1,2 BY ADV. SRI.BIJU .C. ABRAHAM
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
acd
PIUS.C. KURIAKOSE &
P.D. RAJAN, JJ.
Mat.Appeal No.496 of 2007
Dated this the 6th day of February, 2013
JUDGMENT
Pius.C. Kuriakose, J.
No representation for the appellant. This appeal has been posted as item No.503 in the disposal list. We close this appeal
without examining the merits of the grounds raised.
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE
P.D. RAJAN, JUDGE.
acd
HARIHARAN NAIR.R.
SMT. SOBHANAKUMARI
VINEETHA
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
P. D. RAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
