Pious Thomas v. G.Vijayakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought relief for an order refusing land mutation mutation despite tax acceptance and possession certificate issued. Contempt court allowed its closure with prejudice to rights.
What did the court decide?
Contempt matter closed with prejudice to rights of petitioner and respondent.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2013/17TH ASWINA, 1935
Con.Case(C).No. 767 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).29912/2012
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 29912/2012 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 03-04-2013
PETITIONERS : -
- PIOUS THOMAS, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.P.T.THOMAS.
- THOMAS JOHN, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.P.T.JOHNSON
PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT PUNNELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THAZHEKKAD P.O., KOMBIDIYAMAKKAL, THRISSUR-680697.
BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2: -
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pious Thomas and Thomas John
- respondent
G. Vijayakumar
- respondent
Sudhakaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court