Single-judge order disposing of a writ petition challenging suspension of a courier license. The court held the writ infructuous after appellate authority passed a subsequent order directing a committee inquiry, leaving rights to be pursued further via that order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2013/16TH ASWINA, 1935
WP(C).No. 8813 of 2013 (B)
PETITIONER : -
KADER MIDEEN WAFER, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED MIYA KHAN, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.FAST & ECONOMIC COURIER, TC 35/518, VIDYA GARDERN, VALLAKADAVU, P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR
RESPONDENTS : -
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-10-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 8813 of 2013 (B)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : -
EXHIBIT P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE SUSPENSION ORDER ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 31.10.2012.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : - NIL.
// TRUE COPY //
P.A. TO JUDGE
DMR/-
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
========================
W.P.(C). No. 8813 of 2013
-------------------------------------------Dated this the 8th day of October, 2013
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is challenging Ext.P3 order of suspension of Courier License given to the petitioner and confirmation of the same by the appellate authority vide Ext.P9.
W.P.C. No.8813 of 2013 -2-
was set aside and a Committee was ordered to be constituted, to look into the matter, in the light of the observations made therein and to pursue further proceedings accordingly. This being the position, nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition, submits the learned Standing Counsel.
of, without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the petitioner to pursue the matter in accordance with law, pursuant to the order dated 11.07.2013 passed by the appellate authority, if the petitioner is actually having any subsisting grievance.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
kp/-
Kader Mideen Wafer
Union of India
The Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs
The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise Customs and Service Tax
The Commissioner of Central Excise Customs and Service Tax, Thiruvananthapuram
The Superintendent of Central Excise and Customs
P.R. Ramachandran Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
