In this contempt proceeding, the respondent filed an affidavit confirming steps taken to recover the disputed amount. The court dropped the contempt petition allowing the petitioner to approach the court if further grievances persist.
Contempt petition dropped with liberty to approach the court if further grievance survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2013/20TH PHALGUNA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 229 of 2013 (S)
----------------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.33786/2010 DATED 19-11-2011)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION (CIVIL):
SOMAN,AGED 60 YEARS, S/O. MADHAVAN, KUZHIKKATTU KIZHEKKATHIL, RAMAPURAM MURI IN KEERIKKAD VILLAGE, KEERIKKAD POST OFFICE, KARTHIKAPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.B.RENJITHKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.3 IN THE WRIT PETITION (CIVIL):
VENUGOPAL, IAS,
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE,CIVIL STATION, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 001. (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME OF THE RESPONDENT IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-03-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.229/2013
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
| ANNEX A1 | ATTESTED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.33786 OF 2010, DATED 19/11/2012 |
|---|---|
| ANNEX B1 | COPY OF THE REQUEST ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT, DATED |
| 26/12/2012 |
| ANNEX B2 | COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CATD, SHOWING THE PETITIONERS |
|---|---|
| REQUEST HAD RECEIVED BY THE RESPONDENT, DATED 02/01/2013 |
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO.JUDGE
sts
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J
C.O.C. NO. 229 OF 2013
Dated this the 11th day of March, 2013
JUDGMENT
Affidavit is filed by the respondent stating that the steps have been taken for recovering the amount in terms of
Ext. P1. In the light of the affidavit filed, this Contempt Petition is dropped with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court, if any further grievance survives.
Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE JUDGE
DCS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner’s contempt petition should be dismissed in view of the respondent’s compliance.
SOMAN
VENUGOPAL
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
