Petitioner filed a contempt case for non-compliance of directions in W.P.(C) No.27743 of 2011. The court closed the case as the respondents had completed the construction of a concrete cross bar.
The contempt case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/24TH MAGHA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1806 of 2012 (S)
IN WP(C).27743/2011 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 08-12-2011
PETITIONER /WRIT PETITIONER IN W.P.(C) NO.27743/2011:
------------------------------------------------------
PREMRAJ P., S/O.ACHUTHAN NAIR, RESIDING AT THAIVALAPPIL HOUSE, THRIKKANAPURAM.P.O, THAVANOOR (VIA), MALAPPURAM, PIN-679 573.
BY ADV. SRI.C.A.ANOOP.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C)NO.27743/2011:
1. M.C.MOHAN KUMAR, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM-679 505.
2. K.MOOSAKUTTY (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE THAHAZILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM-679 577.
3. A.M.ABDUL JALAL, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SPECIAL GRADE SECRETARY, THAVANUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THAVANOOR.P.O, MALAPPURAM-679 573.
R3 BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE, R3 BY ADV. SMT.N.DEEPA ,
AND
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rvs.
Con.Case(C).No. 1806 of 2012 (S) IN WP(C).27743/2011
APPENDIX
| PETITIONER'S AN ANNEXURE-I- |
NEXURES : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 08/12/2011 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)NO.27743/2011(P). |
|---|---|
| ANNEXURE-II- | TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION RECEIVED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 01/03/2012. |
| ANNEXURE-III- | TRUE COPY OF THE DIRECTION GIVEN TO THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DATED 03/08/2012. |
| ANNEXURE-IV- | TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT DATED 16/10/2012. |
| ANNEXURE-V- RESPONDENT'S AN |
TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 16/09/2012 WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARDS AND POSTAL RECEIPTS. NEXURES : |
| ANNEXURE-R3(1)- | A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.9936/03 DATED 28/01/2012 OF THE THAHSILDAR, PONNAI. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(2)- | A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.DM4/53199/11 DATED 27/02/2012 FROM THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(3)- | A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.B2-1791/12 DATED 05/03/2012. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(4)- | A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 25/05/2012 SUBMITTED TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(5)- | A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 06/06/2012 SUBMITTED TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(6)- | A TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE PANCHAYATH COMMMITTEE DATED 08/10/2012. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(7)- | A TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES BENEFICIARY COMMITTEE DATED 19/10/2012. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(8)- | A TRUE COPY OF A LETTER DATED 28/10/2012. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(9)- | A TRUE COPY OF DECISION OF THE PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE HELD ON 02/11/2012. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(10)- | A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER FROM ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (LSGD) DATED 12/11/2012. |
| ANNEXURE-R3(11)- | A TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE DATED 27/11/2012. |
/True Copy/
P.A.TO JUDGE
rvs.
ANTONY DOMINIC,J
C.O.(C)No.1806 of 2012
Dated this the 13th day of February, 2013
JUDGMENT
Non-compliance of the directions in the judgment in W.P.(c) No.27743 of 2011, led the petitioner to file this Contempt Case. During the pendency of the judgment, respondents have completed the construction of a concrete cross bar and a report to that effect has been filed along with the memo dated 05.02.2013 of the counsel appearing for the third respondent.
In that view of the matter, this Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
ln
PREMRAJ P.
M.C.MOHAN KUMAR
K.MOOSAKUTTY
A.M.ABDUL JALAL
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
