Bindu v. Satheesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged compliance with a prior order on land acquisition reward. Court held proceedings closed as award passed, allowing petitioner to produce award if respondent fails to communicate it.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed; petitioner permitted to produce judgment to respondent for award delivery.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/22ND MAGHA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 123 of 2013 (S)
(AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.18698/2012 DATED 8-08-2012)
CONTEMPT PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
BINDHU,AGED 48, D/O. M. RAJAMMA, T.C 9/1904, ''BINDHU'', SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ
SMT.E.S.SONI
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
K.N.SATHEESH, I A S., AGED NOT KNOWN, S/O. NOT KNOWN, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there can be proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act once the impugned judgment on land acquisition has been complied with.
Whether the petitioner remains entitled to an order/direction since the award has not been physically communicated to them.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BINDHU
- respondent
K.N.SATHEESH
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court