Allowed

Mansoor v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC4 Dec 2013Bail Appl./7835/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Ernakulam granted bail to the petitioner accused in a bail application filed in crime No. 1396 of 2013, subject to surrender for interrogation, execution of a bond with sureties, reporting timelines, and specific conduct conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted upon surrender, execution of bond with sureties, reporting to IO, and compliance with specified conditions.

Mansoor Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 7835 of 2013 ()

¶6

CRIME NO. 1396/2013 OF TIRUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM

¶7

PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:

¶8

----------------------

¶9

MANSOOR, AGED 30 YEARS S/O. BASHEER, CHERIYADAN HOUSE, CHERUSSOLA P.O., SOGATHAMADU, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN

¶11

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

¶12

----------------------

¶13

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

¶14

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LALIZA

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

¶17

THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.

¶18

=========================

¶19

Bail Application No.7835 of 2013 ============================ Dated this the 4^th day of December, 2013

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

Petitioner is the first accused, in Crime No.1396 of

¶22

2013 of the Tirur police station for the offences punishable

¶23

under Secs. 341, 323, 324 and 308 r/w. Sec.34 of the Penal

¶24

Code, apprehends arrest and has filed this application.

¶25

Learned public has submitted that on 01.10.2013 at

¶26

about 06:00 p.m., the petitioner and the second accused

¶27

attacked the de facto complainant knowing that the latter is

¶28

suffering from kidney disease.

¶29

Learned counsel submits that petitioner is not

¶30

involved in the incident and that even as per version of the

¶31

prosecution, no weapon was (allegedly) used.

¶32

B.A No.7835 of 2013

¶33

¶34

Having regard to the circumstances, I am inclined

¶35

to grant relief to the petitioner but subject to conditions as

¶36

the investigation shall not be affected.

¶37

Resultantly, this application is allowed as under:

¶38

1. Petitioner shall surrender before the officer investigating Crime No.1396 of 2013 of the Tirur police station on 11.12.2013 at 10:00 a.m. for interrogation.

¶39

1. In case interrogation is not completed that day, it is open to the investigating officer to direct presence of the petitioner before him on other date/dates and time which the petitioners shall comply.

¶40

1. In case of arrest, petitioner shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day.

¶41

1. On such production, the petitioner shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) in Crime No.1396 of 2013 of the Tirur police station on his executing bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions:-

¶42

B.A No.7835 of 2013

¶43

¶44

a) One of the sureties shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶45

b) Petitioner shall report to the Investigating Officer on every Saturday between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. for a period of two months or until filing of the final report, whichever is earlier.

¶46

c) Petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation.

¶47

d) Petitioner shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail.

¶48

e) Petitioner shall not intimidate/influence the witnesses.

¶49

f) It is made clear that in case any of the above condition is violated, it is open to the Investigating Officer to seek cancellation of the bail granted hereby by moving application before the learned magistrate (until commital if any and thereafter before the learned Principal Judge concerned) as held in P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR 2006 Supreme Court 100).

¶50

Sd/-

¶51

THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE

¶52

//true copy//

¶53

P.A. to Judge

¶54

Smv

Mansoor v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mansoor v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Praveen K.Ravi Vs State of Kerala

Kumar Vs the State of Kerala

Sajeesh Vs the State of Kerala

T.Santha Vs Excise Inspector, Excise Range

Harshad.J.R Vs State of Kerala

Lijo Vs Circle Inspector of Excise