T.Biji v. a.Antony
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal challenged a decree awarding damages for the destruction of a coir factory. The High Court upheld the lower court's findings that the appellant demolished the plaintiff's factory and trees, confirming the title to the plaintiff and dismissing the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed with costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013/26TH POUSHA 1934
AS.No. 25 of 2002 (E)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS.262/1995 of SUB COURT, CHERTHALA DATED 24-07-2001
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
T.BIJI, W/O.SIDHARTHAN, AGED 34 YEARS, RESIDING IN KURISUNKAL, KADAKKARAPPALLY VILLAGE CHERTHALA.
BY ADV. SRI.M.P.KRISHNAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
A.ANTONY, S/O.THOMAS, AGED 48 YEARS, RESIDING IN PALASSERRY VELI, KADAKKARAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHERTHALA.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.TITUS MANI VETTOM
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the findings recorded by the court below regarding the plaintiff's title and the destruction of the factory are sustainable on evidence.
Whether the appellant has made out any valid ground to interfere with the judgment and decree passed by the court below.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.BIJI
- respondent
A.ANTONY
Coram
HARUN-UL-RASHID
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court