Dismissed
K.K.Sasidharan v. the Excise Commissioner
Kerala HCWP(C)/8268/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/25TH JYAISHTA 1934S
WP(C).No. 8268 of 2006 (H)
PETITIONER(S):
K.K.SASIDHARAN, S/O.KUMARAN, SHYAM NIVAS, KUDAVECHOOR
VAIKOM, DISTRICT KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.REGHU KOTTAPPURAM
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER,
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE,
3. M.S.SAJEEV,
4. MANOJ,
5. RAJEEV,
6. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.C.C.THOMAS (SR.) BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.A.ABDUL SHUKOOR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-062012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 8268 OF 2006
===================
Dated this the 15th day of June, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ
petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp
K.K.SASIDHARAN
THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, VAIKOM
M.S.SAJEEV
MANOJ
RAJEEV
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court