Federal Bank Ltd. v. E.P.Abraham
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed by Federal Bank to quash a claim petition and declare Labour Court lack of jurisdiction over matters involving a banking company. Court reserved decision directing Labour Court to determine jurisdiction as a preliminary issue.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/7TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
WP(C).No. 8029 of 2012 (C)
PETITIONER(S):
THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., SULTHAN BATHERI BRANCH, CHULLIYODU ROAD, WYNAD. (REPRESENTED BY ASST. GENERAL MANAGER, INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DIVISION, HEAD OFFICE, ALUVA).
BY ADVS.SRI.K.ANAND (A.201) SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. E.P. ABRAHAM, S/O.PAILY,
IDIYAND HOUSE, MADAKKARA, SULTHAN BATHERI, WYNAD DISTRICT-673 592.
2. TRUEMEN CONSULTING SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., 5 ROYAL PALMS GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB, AAREY MILK COLONY, GOREGAM EAST, MUMBAI-400 065.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Labour Court at Kannur has jurisdiction to try an application filed under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act involving a banking company where the appropriate Government is the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THE FEDERAL BANK LTD.
- respondent
E.P. ABRAHAM
- respondent
TRUEMEN CONSULTING SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.
- respondent
LABOUR COURT, KANNUR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court