S.K.Joseph v. S.K.Ittoop and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed a writ petition for default due to non-appearance by the petitioner and failure to cure procedural defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/6TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
WP(C).No. 17864 of 2010 (G)
PETITIONER:
S.A. JOSEPH, SANKOORICKAL HOUSE, NARAKKAL PO, 682 505.
BY ADV. SRI.V.C.JAMES
RESPONDENTS:
R2 & 3 BY ADV. SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH
R3 BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI, SC, ERNAKULAM DIST.CO.OP.BANK LTD.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27-11-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
HARUN-UL-RASHID,J.
W.P.(C) No.17864 of 2010
Dated this the 27th day of November 2012
JUDGMENT
Service not complete on Respondent Nos.1,2,&4. Petitioner on 5.11.2012 represented and the Registrar (Judicial) granted a week time to cure the defects. Defects were not cured within the time.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/- HARUN-UL-RASHID JUDGE
al/-
S.A. Joseph
S.K.Itoop
P.V.Kunjappan
The Ernakulam District Co-operative Bank Ltd
Deputy Registrar/Special Arbitrator
Harun-ul-Rashid
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court