M.Shyjin v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition, holding that the issue was fully covered by a preceding Division Bench judgment (Komalan) with nothing surviving in the current petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed with no survival of the issue.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2012/19TH ASHADHA 1934
WP(C).No. 7750 of 2008 (V)
PETITIONER:
SHYJIN.M.,SHYNE NIVAS, EZHUKONE, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.DR.K.P.SATHEESAN, SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR, SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM).
RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVENRMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has any survival after the Division Bench judgment in Komalan v. State of Kerala.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHYJIN.M.
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- respondent
THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KOLLAM
- respondent
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, KOLLAM EXCISE RANGE, KOLLAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court