Ibrahim v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2012/10TH MAGHA 1933
WPC.No. 688 of 2012 (I)
PETITIONER(S):
IBRAHIM
AGED 33 YEARS, S/O. MOIDUNNI RESIDING AT ACHIPRAVALAPPIL HOUSE, EZHUVATHURUTHY PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 577.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.C.ELDHO SRI.JIJO THOMAS
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. THE TAHSILDAR O/O. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PONNANI - 679 577.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER O/O OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PONNANI - 679 577.
4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PONNANI POLICE STATION, PONNANI - 679 577
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED SHAH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-01-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
svs
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
W.P.(C).No. 688 of 2012
==================
Dated this the 30th day of January, 2012 J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking interim custody of the vehicle seized from the petitioner on allegations of illegal transportation of river sand. The petitioner now submits that in view of the fact that final orders have been passed, this writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the final orders now passed. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty.
sdk+
Sd/S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
IBRAHIM
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court