The Secy. Melattur Grama Panchayath v. P.T.Kuriakose
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed W.P.(C) No. 24441 of 2003 as the petitioner was no longer available to defend the writ petition filed by the Melattur Grama Panchayat challenging an Ombudsman's order. No substantive decision or relief was granted on the merits of the case. The order is a procedural closure due to the absence of the opposing party.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012/16TH SRAVANA 1934
WP(C).No. 24441 of 2003 (I)
PETITIONER(S):
MELATTUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY T.M. KRISHNAN S/O KONDUNNY VAIDYER MELATTUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SAITHANATHA MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
1. P.T. KURIAKOSE S/O P.A. THOMAS THENGUMTHODIYIL VEEDU PATHIRICODE P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
2. OMBUDSMAN FOR THE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MELATTUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY T.M. KRISHNAN
- respondent
P.T. KURIAKOSE
- respondent
OMBUDSMAN FOR THE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court