Joy V.A. v. Balan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam directed the Excise Circle Inspector to investigate allegations made by the petitioner regarding the unauthorized construction and lack of necessary trade licenses for a Toddy Shop in an unauthorized building. The Court ordered an enquiry with specific notice provisions within four weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the third respondent to investigate the complaint with notice and pass orders within four weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012/16TH SRAVANA 1934
WP(C).No. 17757 of 2012 (T)
PETITIONER
JOY V.A., AGED 40 YEARS S/O. ANTONY, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KATHIKUDAM THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. BALAN
- KUNDEPARAMBIL HOSUE, CHEROOR.P.O., VILVATTOM
- THRISSUR DISTRICT LICENSEE OF T.S. NO. 4
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the third respondent should take note of allegations regarding unauthorized construction and operate the shop without a license.
Whether the third respondent should conduct an enquiry with notice to the petitioner and respondent within four weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Joy V.A.
- respondent
Balan
- respondent
Excise Circle Inspector, Chalakudy
- respondent
District Collector, Trissur
- respondent
Kadukutty Gramapanchayat
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court