Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Ullas Vs Nisha — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2012)

Home
Kerala HC
2012
Ullas Vs NishaUllas v. Nisha

Dismissed

Ullas v. Nisha

Kerala HC7 Feb 2012WP(C)/17662/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner dismissed as not pressing the matter. No substantive judgment or reasoning recorded in the text provided.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH

&

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS

TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/18TH MAGHA 1933

WPC.No. 17662 of 2008 (S)

OP.647/2006 of FAMILY COURT, KANNUR

PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

ULLAS, AGED 34, S/O.LATE BHARATHAN, PARUKKARAN HOUSE, POST CHOWWA, KANNUR.

BY ADV. SRI.B.PREMNATH (E)

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:

1 NISHA.K, AGED 28, D/O.LATE ASHOKAN, PANNYAN HOUSE, PODIKKUNDU.P.O, PALLIKKUNNU KANNUR.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
ULLAS
respondent
NISHA.K

Coram

AI extract

K.M.JOSEPH

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 7 Feb 2012 · February
Registered: 12 Jun 2008
Case no.: WP(C)/17662/2008

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K.m.joseph M.l.joseph Francis

Anand Vs Parvathy
6 Feb 2012
Rahul Rajan Vs Prinu Ponnappan
6 Feb 2012
Seena Koyadan Veettil Vs Cherakka Kesavan Jaideep
6 Feb 2012
Shincy Vs Vinod.M.R
7 Feb 2012

Cite this judgement

Ullas v. Nisha, WP(C)/17662/2008 (KL), decided on 7 February 2012.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

K.M.JOSEPH and M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The Writ Petition was dismissed on the grounds that the matter was no longer being pressed by the petitioner, without any detailed reasoning or application of legal provisions.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

R,R1 BY SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN R,R1 BY SMT.K.PUSHPAVATHI

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-022012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.

W.P.(C) No.17662 of 2008

Dated 7^th February, 2012.

J U D G M E N T

K.M.Joseph, J.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that the petitioner is not pressing the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE.

Sd/-

M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE.

tgs

(true copy)

P.S. to Judge.

M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS

CNR

KLHC010598742008

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

K.m.joseph M.l.joseph Francis

Disposal

DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED

Bindhu.P.K Vs Prakash.P.G

7 Feb 2012

Vijayamma Vs Binu Thankappan

7 Feb 2012