Disposed

Antony.a.v. v. State of Kerala and Others

Kerala HC4 Apr 2012WP(C)/17427/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala disposed of the writ petition petitioning for implementation of a notice issued by the Coastal Zone Management Authority. The court ordered respondents to implement final orders passed by the Corporation of Cochin regarding objections to a stop memo.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to implement final orders passed by the Corporation of Cochin regarding objections to a stop memo.

Antony.a.v. Vs State of Kerala and Others — Environment and Pollution | Kerala HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2012/15TH CHAITHRA 1934

¶5

WP(C).No. 17427 of 2011 (C)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

ANTONY.A.V. S/O.VARGHESE, AGED 34 YEARS, ANAMTHURUTHIL HOUSE CHILAVANNUR ROAD, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE KANAYANNUR TALUK.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.M.M.ALIAS

¶9

SMT.NIMISHA ARUN

¶10

RESPONDENT(S):

¶11

STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS

¶12

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY

¶13

DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (A)

¶14

SHASTRA BAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶15

THE DIRECTOR

¶16

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND FORESTS

¶17

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI.

¶18

THE SECRETARY KERALA STATE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY SHASTA BAVAN, PATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶19

THE SECRETARY

¶20

NATIONAL COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND FORESTS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI.

¶21

CORPORATION OF COCHIN

¶22

REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, ERNAKULAM.

¶23

ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

¶24

EAST ZONAL OFFICE, CORPORATION OF COCHIN ,VYTTILA.

¶25

M/S. GALAXY HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED

¶26

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR -P.A.JINAS S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN, AGED 40 YEARS, KALOOR JUNCTION KOCHI-17.

¶27

GALAXY DEVELOPERS

¶28

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR -P.A.JINAS S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN, AGED 40 YEARS, KALOOR JUNCTION KOCHI-17.

¶29

W.P.(C) No.17427 of 2011

¶30

: 2 :

¶31

P.A.JINAS,

¶32

SO. ABDUL RAHMAN, AGED 40 YEARS, GALAXY HOMES

¶33

S.I.U.P.SCHOOL ROAD, KALOOR ,KOCHI-17.

¶34

BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA

¶35

BY ADV. SRI.V.S.SREEJITH,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION

¶36

BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH,SC,COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT

¶37

BY ADV. SRI.T.U.ZIYAD

¶38

BY ADV. SMT.RAMEENA.P.K.

¶39

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶40

BY SRI.P.K.SOYUZ,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION

¶41

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-04-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶42

APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) NO.17427 OF 2011

¶43

EXT.P1	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF TO KERALA.	THE	COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PLAN MAP
EXT.P2	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITIONER TO THE	THE 5TH	COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 20.5.2009
EXT.P3	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITIONER TO THE	THE 3RD	COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 20.5.2009
EXT.P4	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITIONER TO THE	THE 5TH	COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT, DATED 2.7.2010
EXT.P5	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITIONER TO THE	THE 5TH	COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 29.9.2010
EXT.P6	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF DATED 12.2.2011	THE	ORDER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXT.P7	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF BY THE CHAIRMAN O DATED 22.2.2011	THE F CO	LETTER ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER ASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
EXT.P8	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITIONER TO THE	THE 5TH	COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 4.3.2011
EXT.P9	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITIONER TO THE	THE THIR	COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE D RESPONDENT DATED 4.3.2011
EXT.P10	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITIONER TO THE	THE 5TH	COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 24.6.2011
EXT.P11	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITIONER TO THE PROTECTION, NEW DE	THE UNIO LHI	COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE N MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATED 8.12.2010
EXT.P12	PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITIONER TO THE	THE 4TH	COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT, DATED 5.3.2011

¶44

//TRUE COPY//

¶45

P.S. TO JUDGE.

¶46

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

¶47

W.P.(C) No. 17427 of 2011

¶48

Dated this the 4^th day of April, 2012

¶49

J U D G M E N T

¶50

The prayer in the writ petition is to implement Ext.P6 notice issued by the third respondent. I have already directed in W.P.(C) No.16615 of 2011 to hear the third respondent while

¶51

finalising the proceedings initiated by Ext.P8 stop memo therein. The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to implement the final orders passed by the Corporation of Cochin on Ext.P9 objection filed to Ext.P8 stop memo in W.P.(C) No.16615 of 2011.

¶52

No further directions are called for. The writ petition is

¶53

disposed of as above.

¶54

V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

¶55

nj.

¶56

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

¶57

W.P.(C) No. 17427 of 2011

¶58

JUDGMENT

¶59

Dated:- 4^th April, 2012

Antony.a.v. v. State of Kerala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Antony.a.v. v. State of Kerala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anna M.A. Vs New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Saji Abraham Vs the Kadanad Service Co-Op.Bank Ltd.

M.P.Suresh Vs Kerala State Co-Op Bank Ltd.

Pankaj Kasthuri Ayurveda Medical College Vs Anil Kumar

K.N.Marzook Vs a.J.Simon

M/S.Galaxy Homes Vs Corporation of Cochin