Pankaj Kasthuri Ayurveda Medical College v. Anil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case, the High Court of Kerala held that since a review petition in the underlying writ was admitted, the contempt proceedings were premature.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed without prejudice to the right to move afresh after disposal of review petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2012/15TH CHAITHRA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 307 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/8624/2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.8624/2011 DATED 12-01-2012
PETITIONER(S):
PANKAJ KASTHURI AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695572 REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.J.HAREENDRAN NAIR AGED 50, S/O.K.C.JANARDHANAN NAIR
BY ADVS.SRI.B.S.SWATHI KUMAR
SMT.P.V.SOBHANA
SMT.M.G.AISHWARYA
RESPONDENT(S):
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present contempt case is admissible while a review petition is pending.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pankaj Kasthuri Ayurveda Medical College rep. by DG
- respondent
Anil Kumar
- respondent
Anshumann Sharma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court