Rejitha v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012/23RD SRAVANA 1934
WP(C).No. 15919 of 2006 (Y)
PETITIONER(S):
1. REJITHA, W/O. SREEDHARAN NAIR,
2. SRERAJ (MINOR), S/O. SREEDHARAN NAIR,
3. RAJASREE (MINOR),
BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN
SRI.P.A.HARISH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM.
3. DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER KOZHIKODE, (COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN'S, COMPENSATION KOZHIKODE).
4. KALYANI, W/O.LATE KANARANKANDY CHATHU RESIDING AT KALAKKEPURATHU THAZHEKUNI
5. LAKSHMI, W/O. BHASKARAN, RESIDING
(.......2)
-: 2 :-
6. DEVI, W/O. RAMAN, RESIDING AT POYTHUKUNNATH VEEDU, P.O. VELLARAKKADU MOODADI.
7. A. AHAMED HAJI,
8. AYUSHAMMA, W/O. AHAMED HAJI, SWATHTIK BUNGLOW HOSPITAL ROAD, NILAMPUR P.O.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-08-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
WP(C).No.15919 of 2006
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 14th August, 2014.
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the entire amounts due to the petitioner have been received. This writ petition has therefore become infructuous. The same is hence dismissed as infructuous.
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge)
Kvs/-
REJITHA
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE
K.SURENDRA MOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court