Dismissed

Abdul Sathar Ismail Sait v. Asst.Commr. of Income Tax Circle-I

Kerala HC10 Oct 2012WP(C)/11534/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court dismissed this writ petition against findings from a prior High Court judgment which covered the specific legal issue raised by the petitioner. The court relied on Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Kalpaka Transport Co.Ltd.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed following the judgment in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Kalpaka Transport Co.Ltd.

Abdul Sathar Ismail Sait Vs Asst.Commr. of Income Tax Circle-I — Income Tax | Kerala HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/18TH ASWINA 1934

¶5

WP(C).No. 11534 of 2005 (W)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

ABDUL SATHAR ISMAIL SAIT, S/O. LATE KHAN SAHIB ISMAIL HAJI ESSA SAIT, 506 GOVIND APARTMENTS, KALATHIPARAMBIL ROAD KOCHI-682 016.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.KMV.PANDALAI

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

¶11

CIRCLE-1, DIVISION -II, ERNAKULAM.

¶12

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

¶13

COCHIN, C.R.BUILDINGS, I.S.PRESS ROAD

¶14

KOCHI-682 018.

¶15

BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL,GOI(TAXES) BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR IT

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 1010-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

WPC NO.11534/05

¶18

APPENDIX

¶19

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶20

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RETURN INCOME FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 24.2.1997.

¶21

EXT.P2: TRUE COP OF THE INTIMTION UNDER SEC.143(1)(a) ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 1.3.2000.

¶22

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16.1.1998.

¶23

EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30.3.2000 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

¶24

EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2000 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

¶25

EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 27.11.2003 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶26

EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTE DTD.28.9.2004 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶27

EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.3.2005 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

//True Copy//

PA to Judge

ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 11534 OF 2005

¶32

===================

¶33

Dated this the 10^th day of October, 2012

¶34

J U D G M E N T

¶35

The issue raised in this writ petition is covered against the petitioner by virtue of the judgment in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Kalpaka Transport Co.Ltd {(2006) 287 ITR 15

¶36

(Ker)}.

¶37

In view of the above judgment, the writ petition is dismissed.

¶38

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE

¶39

Abdul Sathar Ismail Sait v. Asst.Commr. of Income Tax Circle-I

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Sathar Ismail Sait v. Asst.Commr. of Income Tax Circle-I

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Fi-Desighn & Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Kerala

Tam Media Research Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Commercial Tax Inspector

Jithin V.S. Vs the District Collector

Rohit.S.Kumar Vs K. Madhavan

Y.Jubaira Beevi Vs Income Tax Officer

Aneesh Vs Special Deputy Tahsildar