High Court of Kerala dismissed a contempt petition where the petitioner was aggrieved by the rejection of his application for correction in the birth register. The court held the petitioner should challenge the final order citing corruption rather than filing a contempt case.
Contempt petition closed and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/18TH ASWINA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1441 of 2012 (S) IN WP(C) No. 13061/2012 & WP(C) No. 17237/12
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC.13061/2012 DATED 06-06-2012 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC.17237/2012 DATED 24-07-2012
PETITIONER(S):
ROHIT.S.KUMAR, AGED 27 YEARS S/O.SARATH KUMAR, KOLLAPARAMBIL, P.D.ROAD PALLURUTHY, COCHIN-682006.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
K. MADHAVAN, AGED 48 YEARS HEALTH SUPERVISOR IN CHARGE OF REGISTRAR OF BIRTH AND DEATH CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE, THE REGISTRAR REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS KOZHIKODE CORPORATION.
BY SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COC NO.1441/12
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 6.6.2012 IN WP(C) No. 13061/12.
ANNEXURE A2: JUDGMENT DATED 24.7.2012 IN WP(C) No. 17237/12 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
ANNEXURE A3: TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.F11/63216 DTD 7/6/12 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A4: TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.AF11/63216/12 DATED 24.8.2012 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT.
//True Copy//
PA to Judge
Rp
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Contempt Case (C) NO. 1441 OF 2012
===========================
Dated this the 10th day of October, 2012
J U D G M E N T
By Annexures A1 and A2, the application made by the petitioner for correction in the birth register was ordered to be considered. In pursuance to the direction, Annexure A4 communication was issued and later according to the counsel for the respondent, the application itself has been rejected.
Contempt petition is closed.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp
ROHIT.S.KUMAR
K. MADHAVAN
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
