Sudha Sreekumar v. Regional Transport Authority
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition, recording submission made by counsel that no further orders were necessary due to an existing interim order.
The High Court disposed of the writ petition, recording submission made by counsel that no further orders were necessary due to an existing interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2012/29TH ASHADHA 1934
WP(C).No. 11510 of 2012 (K)
PETITIONER(S):
SUDHA SREEKUMAR, AGED 47 YEARS W/O.SASIKUMAR, BALAKRISHNA MOTORS, GURUVAYOOR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK
RESPONDENT(S):
1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN 678001.
2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678001.
BY GOVT PLEADER SRI. PADMALAYAN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 11510 of 2012 (K)
APPENDIX:
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
| EXT.P1: | A TRUE COPY OF HE ORDER OF RTA, PALAKKAD DATED 29.07.2011. | |
|---|---|---|
| EXT.P2: | A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL IN MVAA NO.315 OF 2011. |
|
| EXT.P3: | A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE STAT DATED 04.01.2012 IN M.P.NO.3/2012 IN MVAA NO.315/2012. |
|
| EXT.P4: | A TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT VALID TILL 19.05.2012. | |
| EXT.P5: | TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT DATED 14.05.2012. |
|
| RESPONDEN | TS | ' EXHIBITS : NIL. |
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE.
KP
K.SURENDRA MOHAN,J.
--------------------------------------------WP(C).No.11510 of 2012
---------------------------------------------Dated this the 20th day of July, 2012
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the interim order already passed by this Court in this writ petition, no further orders are necessary to be issued.
Recording the above submission, this writ petition is disposed of.
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE
kkj
Sudha Sreekumar
Regional Transport Authority Palakkad
K.Surendra Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court