V.U.Afsal v. Sale Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner had informed the court that they were no longer interested in prosecuting the matter.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner was no longer interested in prosecuting the same.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2012/29TH ASHADHA 1934
WP(C).No. 10900 of 2012 (J)
PETITIONER(S):
V.U.AFSAL,, AGED 30 YEARS S/O.USMAN,VALEPPILLY HOUSE,EDAPPALLY.P.O ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.I.V.PRAMOD
RESPONDENT(S):
1. SALE OFFICER, KANAYANNUR PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE & RURALDEVELOPMENT BANK PALARIVATTOM,KOCHI-25.
2. THE SECRETARY, KANAYANNUR PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE & RURALDEVELOPMENT BANK PALARIVATTOM,KOCHI-25.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN FOR R2 BY GOVT PLEADER SRI. P.P PADMALAYAN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.U.AFSAL
- respondent
SALE OFFICER, KANAYANNUR PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE & RURALDEVELOPMENT BANK PALARIVATTOM,KOCHI-25
- respondent
THE SECRETARY, KANAYANNUR PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE & RURALDEVELOPMENT BANK PALARIVATTOM,KOCHI-25
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court