Jincy.P.George v. P.Nisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against Single Judge order in service dispute over promotion post. Court held no scope for appeal as Single Judge directed authorities to hear conflicting claims and decide based on eligibility and merit.
What did the court decide?
Writ Appeal dismissed; matter disposed of with clarification that authorities must hear all contentions regarding relative merit and claims.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2012/15TH CHAITHRA 1934 WA.No. 627 of 2012 () IN WPC/34163/2011 ---------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN .NO./ IN WPC.34163/2011 DATED APPELLANT(S): -----------JINCY.P.GEORGE, AGED 28 YEARS W/O.SIJU HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (JUNIOR)-CHEMISTRY HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, ARIMBUR THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS RESPONDENT(S): -------------1. P.NISHA HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL ARIMBUR, RESIDING AT PATTIYIL HOUSE, FRAVU P.O. THRISSUR-680620. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR ERNAKULAM. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION THRISSUR.
- THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER THRISSUR. 7. HIGH SCHOOL AND HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL ARIMBUR, ST.THERESA'S SHIP CHURCH, ERAVU P.O. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI. K.JAJU BABU BY GOVE. PLEADER SRI. GEORGE MECHERIL.
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-04-2012, ALONG WITH WA. 628/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.A.627 /2012
APPENDIX
ANNEXURE-A: COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON 6.12.2011.
- ANNEXURE-B: COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE MANAGER APPOINTING THE APPELLANT.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a Writ Appeal is maintainable when the Single Judge directed authorities to consider the claimant's eligibility and relative superior claim before deciding.
What course should the educational authorities follow to determine the relative claims of the Writ Petitioner and the Appellant for the promoted teacher position.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jincy P. George
- respondent
P. Nisha
- respondent
The Director of Higher Secondary Education Thiruvananthapuram
- respondent
The Director of Public Instruction Thiruvananthapuram
- respondent
The Regional Deputy Director Ernakulam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court