The High Court of Kerala dismissed a regular second appeal by recording the submission that the appellant had settled the dispute and was not pressing the appeal. Pending interlocutory applications were also dismissed.
Second appeal dismissed as not pressed; all pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2012/22ND ASHADHA 1934
RSA.No. 929 of 2004 ( )
AS.157/1992 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), FAST TRACK COURT NO.1, MANJERI OS.7/1990 of MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
THOTTIVALAPPIL RAMLA, D/O.MUHAMEDKUTTY, AGED 33 YEARS PURATHUR AMSOM, MUTTANNUR DESOM, (P.O.) PURATHUR TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
BY ADV. SRI.M.N.UNNIKRISHNAN - R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.DILIP
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.
R.S.A. No.929 of 2004
Dated this the 13th day of July, 2012.
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant submits that since the parties have
settled the dispute outside court, appeal is not pressed.
2. Submission is recorded.
Second Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge.
cks
THOTTIVALAPPIL RAMLA
ACHU
NARAYANAN
THOMAS P.JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
