The Second Appeal was dismissed as not pressed because the appellants filed a memo stating they accepted the petitioner's decree and the Commissioner's report, thereby withdrawing their challenge.
Second Appeal dismissed as not pressed; pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2012/22ND ASHADHA 1934
RSA.No. 119 of 2007 ( )
AS.24/2004 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VADAKARA OS.163/2002 of MUNSIFF COURT, KOYILANDY
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
BY ADVS.SRI.B.KRISHNAN
SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR - R1 & R4
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.
R.S.A. No.119 of 2007
-------------------------------------Dated this the 13th day of July, 2012.
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellants has filed a memo dated 11.07.2012 stating that the appeal is not pressed since the appellants have decided to accept the preliminary decree passed by the trial court in the light of the allotments made by the Commissioner in the final decree and acceptance of the Commissioner's report by all the parties.
pressed.
All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge.
cks
Shobi Krishna
Shafitha
Deneesh Kumar
Anitha Jose
Ajitha Hari
Sridevi
Thomas P. Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
