shaded portion takes in 2.47 cents and together, the total is 80.02 cents. First appellate court observed that in view of that, claim of title made by the appellant over plaint B schedule cannot be accepted. A further fact which the courts below noted is that according to the appellant, on the south of plaint schedule is the property of Rangan and the public way is on the further south of the property of Rangan In Ext.C4, the Advocate Commissioner found a way on the southern side of plaint A schedule which the Advocate Commissioner has described as a public way. The Advocate Commissioner also reported that plots A and B in Ext.C4 forms the public way on the southern side of plaint A schedule. Exhibit C4 is the first report after the Advocate Commissioner inspected the suit property on 17.07.1997 (immediately after the filing of the suit). There, the southern boundary of plant A schedule is described as a way and its oldness is stated as not less than 1½ months. Still appellant came with a case that on the southern side is the property of Rangan and the public way is on the southern side of property of Rangan.
