Soman v. A.N. Sukumaran
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a second appeal filed by appellants aggrieved by judgment and decree concerning title, boundary fixation, and recovery of possession in a property dispute, finding no substantial question of law involved.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed; all pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/7TH ASHADHA 1934
RSA.NO. 554 OF 2012 ()
AS.39/2010 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR OS.166/2003 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. SOMAN
AGED 49 YEARS,
- S/O. KANNANKUTTY, CHALIKUDY HOUSE KUNNUVAZHI KARA, KARAMPILLY.P.O, MARAMPILLY VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.
2. KARTHIKEYAN, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. KUTTAN KALIYARA HOUSE, PULLUVAZHI KARA RAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether there is a substantial question of law regarding the title declaration and recovery of possession decided by lower courts.
Whether the framing of issues by the trial court regarding title and boundary fixation was sufficient.
Whether the lower courts erred in holding that plaint C and D schedules are part of plaint A schedule and admitting no reliable evidence of dedication.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Soman, Karthikeyan
- appellant
Bhargavi Amma, Manikuttan
- respondent
A.N. Sukumaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court