Louis v. Rosily
Case brief
What is this about?
This regular second appeal arose from a partition suit. The court noted that a dispute was settled between parties via a compromise agreement during mediation. The court allowed the request to substitute prior decrees with one based on the settlement and recorded the agreement as part of the decree.
What did the court decide?
Decree substituted with one based on the compromise agreement dated 15.02.2012; mediator fees fixed at `15,000.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2012/23RD CHAITHRA 1934
RSA.No. 401 of 2004 (F)
AS.140/2000 of III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), FAST TRACK -I, THRISSUR OS.10/1997 of MUNSIFF COURT,CHAVAKKAD
APPELLANT(S)//RESPONDENT NO.6/DFENDANT NO.7.:
LOUIS, S/O.NEYYAN OUSEPPUNNY, IRINGAPURAM AMSOM, THIRUVENKITAM DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.T.M.CHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5, 7 & 8/DEFENDANT NOS.2 TO 4/PLAINTIFFS-DEFENDANT NOS.1, 5, 6, 8 & 9:
- ROSILY,D/O.MULLAKKAL THOMA, ALOOR VILLAGE, MATTOM DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK.
- ANNIE,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be disposed of based on a compromise agreement reached during mediation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Louis
- respondent
Rosily
- respondent
Annie
- respondent
Kathreena
- respondent
Annamma
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court