The Kerala High Court dismissed a regular second appeal as withdrawn, accepting the appellant's submission that the dispute was settled outside court.
The appeal was allowed to be withdrawn and accordingly dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2012/22ND CHAITHRA 1934
RSA.No. 234 of 2012 () ---------------------AS.100/2005 of SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM OS.153/1998 of MUNI-MAGI.COURT,MANNARKAD
APPELLANT(S)/R1/1ST DEFENDANT:
KAKKOOTH HAMSA AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.POCKER, KAKKOOTH HOUSE PARATTIPADI, PAYYANEDAM AMSOM AND DESOM MANNARKKAD TALUK.
BY ADVS.SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI SRI.R.SREEHARI
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS & LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF 1ST APPELLANT & RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3/PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS 2 AND 3: --------------------------------------------------------------
RSA.No. 234 of 2012
2
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-04-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.
R.S.A.No.234 of 2012
Dated this 11th day of April, 2012
JUDGMENT
Appellant has filed a memo signed by himself and counsel as well, stating that the dispute is settled outside Court and hence the appeal may be allowed to be withdrawn.
counsel I am inclined to allow the appeal to be withdrawn.
(THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE)
Sbna/-
KAKKOOTH HAMSA
NABEESA
RUKHIYA
MOIDEEN
MOHAMMEDALI (2-10)
AZEEZ
THOMAS P. JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
