The Revision Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the revision petition filed under the Family Court. The High Court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without further adjudication on merits.
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/25TH JYAISHTA 1934S
RPFC.No. 121 of 2012 (E)
IN MC.152/2010 of FAMILY COURT, ETTUMANOOR
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/REVISION PETITIONER./RESPONDENT:
SUJIMON ANTONY @ SUJI S/O.ANTONY, NADACKAL HOUSE, ATHIRAMPUZHA.
BY ADVS.SRI.B.PREMOD
SRI.R.PREM SANKAR
RESPONDENTS/PTEITIONERS:
1. JAYA @ MARY JACQUILIN NADACKAL HOUSE, ATHIRAMPUZHA KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-688562.
2. SCARIACHAN (MINOR) NADACKAL HOUSE, ATHIRAMPUZHA KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-688562.
3. ANNA D/O.SUJIMON ANTONYM NADACKAL HOUSE, ATHIRAMPUZHA KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-688562.
BY ADV.SMT. JAYA @ MARY JACQUILIN & OTHERS
THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 15-06-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
===========================
R.P. (F.C.) NO. 121/2012
===========================
Dated this the 15th day of June 2012
O R D E R
When t his matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is not intending to pursue with this revision petition any further. This
is recorded. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
C.T. RAVIKUMAR (JUDGE)
kvr/
/True copy/
P.A. TO JUDGE
SUJIMON ANTONY @ SUJI
JAYA @ MARY JACQUILIN
SCARIACHAN (MINOR)
ANNA
C.T. RAVIKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
