Dismissed

Space Engineers Welfare Society (Sewels) v. L.Sindhu

Kerala HC15 Nov 2012RP/946/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court dismissed a review petition challenging an interim order that directed the first respondent to disburse subsistence allowance. The court observed that the due allowance had already been paid by the respondent, rendering the review unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

The review petition was dismissed as the subsistence allowance had already been disbursed by the first respondent.

Space Engineers Welfare Society (Sewels) Vs L.Sindhu — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/24TH KARTHIKA 1934

¶5

RP.No. 946 of 2012 (K) IN WPC.NO. 8505/2012 --------------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN IA.NO.10457/2012 IN WPC.8505/2012 DATED 20-09-2012

¶6

REVIEW PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

¶7

SPACE ENGINEERS WELFARE SOCIETY (SEWELS) PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, APPOINTED AS RECEIVER IN C.M.A.NOS.98/2008, 99 OF 2008 AND 101 OF 2008 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH SRI.K.RAJESH KANNAN SRI.A.S.SHAMMY RAJ SRI.P.SHANES

¶9

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4/ RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1. L.SINDHU, MITRANIKETHAN LADIES HOSTEL FOR WORKING WOMEN,

¶11

PATTOOR, VANCHIYOOR P.O.,

¶12

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 035.

¶13

2. LABOUR COMMISSIONER,

¶14

STATE ADVISORY CONTRACT LABOUR BOARD, A.K.TOWERS,

¶15

BAKERY JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 012.

¶16

3. DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER & SECRETARY,

¶17

STATE ADVISORY CONTRACT LABOUR BOARD,

¶18

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶19

4. STATE OF KERALA,

¶20

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (LABOUR),

¶21

SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶22

R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJENDRAN NAIR

¶23

R1 BY ADV.MR.K.MUHAMMED SALAHUDEEN

¶24

R2 TO R4 BY SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶25

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-11-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶26

¶27

RP.No. 946 of 2012 (K)

¶28

APPENDIX

¶29

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

¶30

ANN.1:	COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE CITY OFFICE OF THE PETITIONER.
ANN.2:	COPY OF THE PAYMENT SLIP DATED 21/5/212.
ANN.3:	COPY OF THE UNSIGNED PAYMENT VOUCHER DATED 03/4/2012.
ANN.4:	COPY OF THE FORM OF NON-EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATE.
ANN.5:	CARBON COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.10457/2012 IN WPC.NO.8505/2012 DATED 20/9/2012 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

¶31

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:

¶32

ANN.R1: COPY OF MOBILE BILL PRINT OUT SHOWING THE DETAILS OF CALL FROM 1ST RESPONDENT'S MOBILE NUMBER 9633507429.

/TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE

HARUN-UL-RASHID,J.

¶37

R.P.NO.946 OF 2012 IN I.A.NO.10457 OF 2012 IN W.P.(C).NO.8505 OF 2012

¶38

DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012

¶39

O R D E R

¶40

Review Petition is filed seeking to review the

¶41

interim order passed in I.A.No.10457/2012 in W.P.(C).No.8505/22012. This Court directed the review petitioner to disburse the subsistence allowance to the petitioner for the period March 2012 to August 2012.

¶42

When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel on both sides submits that the subsistence allowance due to the petitioner has been disbursed by the lst respondent. In such circumstances, no orders are required in the review petition.

¶43

Review Petition is dismissed. Post the writ petition for

¶44

hearing.

¶45

HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE.

¶46

kcv.

Space Engineers Welfare Society (Sewels) v. L.Sindhu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Space Engineers Welfare Society (Sewels) v. L.Sindhu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.N.Radha and Others Vs Natika Firka Co-Operative Rural Bank

Wilson Thomas Vs Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Ernakulam

K.E Ahammed Kutty Vs the Regional Transport Authority

M/S.Malabar Palace Vs General Secretary, Kozhikode Vanijya Vya

P.Victor Cleatus Vs Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Board

Ravi A.V. Vs the Joint Regional Transport Officer