Liju Balan v. Smeha
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought status quo under Article 226 of the Constitution regarding an interim maintenance order. Due to petitioner's absence and dismissal of the underlying petition ex parte, the writ petition was closed without prejudice to available legal remedies.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/17TH MAGHA 1933
OPFC.No. 428 of 2012 (R)
AGAINST CRL.M.P.2015/11 IN MC.599/2011 of FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR
PETITIONER:
LIJU BALAN S/O. CHOPARAMBHIL VEETTIL BALAN KOODAPUZHA NORTH DESOM CHALAKUDY VILLAGE PRESENTLY WORKING AS AIRSIDE OPERATOR RAMP SERVICE, DUBAI WORLD CENTRAL AIRPORT P.O. BOX NO.1515 DUBAI, UAE REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER LIBIN C BALAN S/O. CHOPARAMBIL VEETTIL BALAN KOODAPUZHA NORTH DESOM, CHALAKUDY VILLAGE THRISSUR DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN
RESPONDENTS:
- SNEHA D/O. NJATTUKETTY RAGHAVAN KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE MOONNUPEEDIKA DESOM KODUNGALLUR TLAUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680681
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order of the Family Court directing maintenance payment should be set aside and matter remanded for fresh consideration.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
LIJU BALAN
- respondent
SNEHA
- respondent
AADIKESAVA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court