Ameena v. Kamaludeen
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam held that an original petition challenging an interim order was not maintainable, close the filing without examining merits, and clarified continuation of the interim injunction for seven days.
What did the court decide?
Original petition closed; interim injunction extended for seven more days.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE &
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/24TH KARTHIKA 1934
OP (FC).No. 2080 of 2012 (R)
---------------------------------------[AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA.NO.2785/2011 IN O.P.NO.856/2011 OF FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM]
PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT:
AMEENA, D/O. SULEKHA BEEVI, AMEENA MANZIL, UDAYATHARA NAGAR-155, ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY SMT.V.P.SEEMANTHINI, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADVS.SRI.M.R.ANISON,
SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI, SMT.P.A.RINUSA, SMT.ANNIE JACOB, SMT.T.B.REMANI.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AMEENA
- respondent
KAMALUDEEN
- respondent
NUJUMUDEEN
- respondent
ABDUL AZEEZ
- respondent
NABEESA BEEVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court