The Management of Itdc, Kovalam v. the Labour Court, Kollam
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought to quash a Labour Court award directing reinstatement. The court was informed that the respondents are not interested in pursuing the matter. The court accordingly closed the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2012/11TH MAGHA,1933
OP.No. 9990 of 2000 (L)
PETITIONER:
THE MANAGEMENT OF ITDC, KOVALAM ASHOK BEACH RESORT, KOVALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.
BY ADVS.SRI.U.K.RAMAKRISHNAN (SR.) SRI.E.K.MADHAVAN SRI.P.V.LOHITHAKSHAN
SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON
RESPONDENTS:
- THE LABOUR COURT, KOLLAM.
- M. SESHA IYER, T.C. 37/1612, THAMMAN STREET, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (DIED)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to quash the award directing reinstatement of the workman published by the Labour Court.
How to proceed when the main applicants in the Labour Court matter wish to cease pursuing the matter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Management of ITDC, Kovalam Ashok Beach Resort, Kovalam, Thiruvananthapuram
- respondent
The Labour Court, Kollam
- respondent
M. Mangalam
- respondent
P. Seethalekshmi
- respondent
P. Rugmini
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court