Santhoshji v. Johnson
Case brief
What is this about?
This appellate order dismissed the respondent's objection to striking out scandalous paragraphs from a plaint, allowing the earlier application and directing the plaintiff to carry out the deletion within one month.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order set aside; application allowed; respondent directed to amend plaint within one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/11TH KARTHIKA 1934
OP(C).No. 250 of 2012 (O)
IA.NO.3413/2011 IN OS.503/2006 of MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTARAKKARA
PETITIONER(S):
SANTHOSHJI, S/O.LATE KUNJU PILLAY, THENGUVILA VEEDU AMBALAKARA MURI, VALAKOM VILLAGE KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM
SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN
RESPONDENT(S):
JOHNSON S/O.YOHANNAN, ROJA NIVAS, CHERUVAKKAL MURI ELAMMADU VILLAGE KOLLAM. REP.BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER - GEORGE S/O.KOCHUMMAN, VADAKKE VILA VEEDU, CHERUVAKKAL ELAMADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the application to strike out pleadings impugned by the lower court for failure to carry out the earlier order.
Whether to direct the plaintiff to amend the plaint within a specified time.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
SANTHOSHJI, S/O.LATE KUNJU PILLAY
- respondent
JOHNSON S/O.YOHANNAN
Coram
V. CHITAMBARESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court