O.J.Justine v. Anitha
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant argued the matrimonial appeal was infructuous due to a subsequent Family Court judgment. The court dismissed the appeal as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Matrimonial Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2012/25TH ASHADHA 1934
Mat.Appeal.No.838 of 2008 ( )
-----------------------------OP.619/2003 OF FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT(S):
O.J.JUSTINE, S/O.O.D.JOSEPH OTTUPURAKKAL HOUSE, NETTOOR P.O. MARADU 682 304.
BY ADVS.DR.SEBASTIAN CHAMPAPPILLY
SRI.M.P.RAJU SMT.ANNIE GEORGE SMT.RINTA GEORGE
RESPONDENT(S):
ANITHA, D/O.P.A.JOHN PULICKAL HOUSE, P.C.AUGUSTINE ROAD PANAYAPPILLY (WEST), MATTANCHERRY KOCHI 682 002.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
O.J.Justine
- respondent
Anitha
Coram
K.T.Sankaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court