In a matrimonial appeal, the High Court dismissed the matter for default due to the appellants' non-appearance and failure to cure the defect of representation, with no substantive judgment rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/26TH MAGHA 1933
Mat. Appeal.No. 681 of 2011 C
OS.126/2003 of FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM
APPELLANT(S):
BY ADV. SRI.R.MURALEEKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
R2 BY SRI.V.V.RAJA
CAVEATOR R2 BY SRI.RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN R2 BY SRI.R.RANJITH R2 BY SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-02-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. M. JOSEPH &
M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
----------------------------------------MAT. APPEAL NO.681 OF 2011 C
-----------------------------------------Dated this the 15th February, 2012
JUDGMENT
K.M. Joseph, J.
Even today, there is no representation for the appellants. The
defect is not yet cured. Appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/=
K. M. JOSEPH,
JUDGE
Sd/=
M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS,
JUDGE
kbk.
// True copy//
PS to Judge
2
LEENA
CLINT
ABHIRAMI
MOSES
PUSHPALAYAN
K.M. JOSEPH
M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
